Content Theft and Second Life

The content theft in Second Life is starting to gain attention out in the real world - places and bloggers that don't usually report on Second Life.

Though in my opinion, the content theft in Second Life is not actually "theft" by definition of the word (the creators are not actually deprived of the creation,) rather it is plagiarism, I also can understand why the term is used. It packs a heavier punch, even though the real reason the term is used has more to do with our laziness and lack of true understanding of our own language. And many can be rather niggardly about it.

This is a good read.

Not so much that it's about the complaints, (and even shrill, in some cases, whining,) about the current lead of comment, but because it applies to all plagiarism in SL - including those who 'borrow' from real life, such as popular names and logos.

"What these programs do is allow users to copy models and designs from others of the Second Life universe. However, typically these creations are sold in virtual shops and are not designed to be copied. In fact, Second Life has a permissions system that, theoretically, is supposed to prevent such unauthorized copying."
PlagiarismToday - » Content Theft and Second Life
Blogged with the Flock Browser


About this entry


1 comments:

  1. Anonymous Thursday, March 13, 2008 at 12:26:00 PM PDT

    I'll agree openly that the term content theft is a misnomer. But really, the entire area of intellectual property is filled with misnomers.

    File sharing, for example, is not sharing but copying. One is not deprived of the files they have "shared" with others.

    "Content theft" is not really content theft, it is copyright infringement and/or plagiarism. There is no "theft" in the traditional sense of the word.

    Even "intellectual property" fails somewhat in that it is not property in the traditional sense either. It is not a physical being and one does not "own" it, just exclusive rights to it.

    This is the nature of the beast I am afraid. These are the terms people use and I have to work with them.

    Anyway, I'm saying that I agree with you but none of this should come as a shock in a society where we park on a driveway and drive on a parkway.

    It all just stems from our brain trying to connect intellectual property with physical property. Pretty much everyone is guilty of it.

    Anyway, I'm glad that you found the article to be a good read!